Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A6 is just a bit better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, with a global score of 75.8 against 72.1. The Galaxy A6 is a a little bit heavier device than OPPO Reno4 Pro, but both have the same thickness. OPPO Reno4 Pro has an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a higher display pixel density, a bigger screen and a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a bit superior processor than Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a little bit better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The OPPO Reno4 Pro features superior battery life than Galaxy A6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.