Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2017) has a general score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's score of 72.1. Galaxy A7 (2017) is a noticeably older, heavier and just a bit thicker phone than the OPPO Reno4 Pro. OPPO Reno4 Pro has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little bigger screen and a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has more RAM memory.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a lot better camera than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a much more megapixels camera, a bigger camera aperture and a lot better video resolution. OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has an 11% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.