Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-05 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A70 has a general score of 76.9, which is a little bit better than OPPO Reno4 Pro's score of 72.1. Even though the Galaxy A70 is a better cellphone than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, it must be noted that it's also older, just a little bit thicker and heavier. These phones work with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System).
The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has more RAM. OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A70, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a little bit better pixel density.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features a greater camera than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a way bigger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality. Galaxy A70 has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A70 also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy A70 features a bit superior battery performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.