Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 is a lot better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, with a global score of 87.5 against 72.1. Galaxy A71 is a a little heavier cellphone than OPPO Reno4 Pro, but they have the same thickness. Both devices we are comparing work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A71 has 11 version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives you some extra features.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A71, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a little better pixels density.
The Galaxy A71 has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A71 also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A71 counts with a bit longer battery duration than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a bit better camera than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a larger sensor which provides a better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.