Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is way better than OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 general score. Even though the Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better cellphone than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, it must be noted that it is also a somewhat heavier and a little thicker cellphone. Both devices in our current comparison work with the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding OS features.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a just a bit better screen density. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit faster CPU than OPPO Reno4 Pro. Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a little better battery lifetime than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery size. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has just a bit better camera than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light images, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs and a back camera with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.