Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2018-01-06 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A8 (2018) is a little bit better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, getting a 79.2 score against 72.1. Galaxy A8 (2018)'s body is notably older, just a little thicker and just a little heavier than the OPPO Reno4 Pro. OPPO Reno4 Pro features just a little better processing power than Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a little inferior amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Galaxy A8 (2018) has just a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have the same camera aperture, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a back camera with much more MP and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.