Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-08-05 | -- |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 4.06 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 11 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 3.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Alpha is a bit better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, with a 76.3 score against 72.1. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Alpha has the newer 4.4.4 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy Alpha's construction is noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner than OPPO Reno4 Pro.
The Galaxy Alpha has a CPU that's very similar to OPPO Reno4 Pro's processor, because although the Galaxy Alpha has a lower number of cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processor. OPPO Reno4 Pro has a little bit better screen than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a better screen density, a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a really bigger screen.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a way bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and videos and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has 128 GB internal storage. OPPO Reno4 Pro features a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 115 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.