Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F41 has a general score of 85.2, which is much better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's global score of 72.1. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison review, we must highlight that it's also a thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy F41 has a newer 11 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10, providing you some nice extra features and optimized performance.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy F41, because it has a little bit bigger display, a little bit better amount of pixels per screen inch, a lot brighter screen and a little higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy F41 and OPPO Reno4 Pro both count with extremely similar processors, and although the Samsung Galaxy F41 has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy F41 captures just a bit better videos and photos than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels and a larger back camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy F41 features a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy F41 has a really longer battery lifetime than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.