Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 is a lot better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, getting an 88.1 score against 72.1. Even being the best in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy F62 design is extremely heavier and thicker than the OPPO Reno4 Pro. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy F62 has newer 11 version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version, giving you some additional features and performance tweaks.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a little greater number of pixels per screen inch and way more brightness. The Galaxy F62 features a much bigger storage for apps and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy F62 also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1 TB.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy F62, because it has 2 GB more RAM and 4 more cores. The Galaxy F62 counts with a way better battery duration than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a little bit better camera than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a much better resolution camera in the back and a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.