Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-05 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is way better than OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 general score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10, so it provides a lot of extra features. The Galaxy Fold body is a little thinner than OPPO Reno4 Pro, although it is noticeably heavier and was released only 10 months before.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a brighter display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater screen density. Samsung Galaxy Fold has just a bit better performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Fold has just a little better battery performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 10% more battery size. The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a way bigger sensor and a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.