Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-08-05 | 2018-06-28 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Blue, Gold and Pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy J8 has a score of 76.7, which is slightly better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 score. Despite being the best we are comparing, it must be noted that it's also way older, just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. These phones include the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a much better looking display than Galaxy J8, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a quite bigger screen and a better pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy J8 counts with a little bit better memory for games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy J8, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. OPPO Reno4 Pro features a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J8, because it has a 14% greater battery size. OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a greater camera than Galaxy J8, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a way larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way better video definition and a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.