Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-08-05 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M30 has a score of 82.4, which is much better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 score. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy M30 has newer 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10. Samsung Galaxy M30 is an older, just a little thicker and a little heavier phone than the OPPO Reno4 Pro.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features a brighter display than Galaxy M30, because it has a bit bigger display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a little better pixels quantity in each screen inch. OPPO Reno4 Pro has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy M30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro captures way better videos and photos than Galaxy M30, because it has a camera in the back with a much better resolution, a way larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a bigger aperture. Galaxy M30 features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy M30 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy M30 features longer battery lifetime than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.