Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has a general score of 87.7, which is way better than OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 overall score. Both devices in this comparison review work with the same Android 10 OS. Galaxy M51 is a thicker and heavier cellphone than OPPO Reno4 Pro. The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy M51 has just a bit better camera than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a much better resolution camera in the back and a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a much better memory to install applications and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M51 features a really longer battery performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.