Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is much better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, with a 90.8 score against 72.1. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, it must be told that it's also a a little bit thicker and heavier device. The Galaxy Note 20 has a bit superior processing unit than OPPO Reno4 Pro. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a more vivid display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a bit higher pixels density. The OPPO Reno4 Pro captures a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor offering a worse image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a camera with lot more mega pixels, higher video frame rates and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos.
OPPO Reno4 Pro and Galaxy Note 20 both have quite similar memory capacity for games and applications, both of them have equal internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has just a bit better battery life than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.