Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, getting a 98.9 score against 72.1. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version, so it counts with a couple additional features and performance improvements. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, we must note that it is also noticeably heavier and a little bit thicker.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features a little bit better screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display, a little bit smaller display and a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit better processing power than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much better camera than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much better video quality, a much better 108 MP resolution back facing camera and a lot bigger sensor taking lot higher quality photographs and videos.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features just a bit better battery life than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 13% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.