Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is much better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, with a overall score of 81.2 against 72.1. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is a better cellphone than OPPO Reno4 Pro, it must be noted that it is also an extremely older, just a little bit thicker and a little heavier cellphone. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with more cores and more RAM memory. OPPO Reno4 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little bit larger display and a just a little better number of pixels per inch in the screen.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a very superior camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a much bigger aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited environments and a much more megapixels camera in the back.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. OPPO Reno4 Pro features improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.