Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 has a general score of 79.3, which is slightly better than OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 score. The Galaxy Note 5 is a just a little heavier cellphone than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, but both of them are 0.3inches thick. These devices include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 5 has older 5.1 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10.
OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a larger amount of RAM and more cpu cores. The Galaxy Note 5 features a little sharper display than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a camera with a way higher resolution, a much bigger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs and a larger aperture to take better photography in low light environments.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. The OPPO Reno4 Pro features better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.