Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition has an overall score of 80.4, which is much better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 general score. Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, we must tell that it's also a notably older, a little bit thicker and just a little heavier cellphone. The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little lower amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite larger display.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little bit more memory capacity for apps and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 256 GB.
OPPO Reno4 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality pictures and videos and a much more MP camera in the back.
OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with improved battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.