Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is a lot better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, getting a global score of 89 against 72.1. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, Galaxy Note10 is an older, just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier cellphone than the OPPO Reno4 Pro. Samsung Galaxy Note10 has just a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a little larger screen and a little better count of pixels in each inch of display. OPPO Reno4 Pro has a better camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light images and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera and a much bigger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality pictures and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a much better storage for games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has more internal memory capacity. The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.