Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite is better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, having an 86.2 score against 72.1. The Galaxy Note10 Lite is better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, it must be noted that it's also a somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier phone. These phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Note10 Lite has the newer 11 version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a bit superior CPU than OPPO Reno4 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a just a little better pixels count in each inch in the display.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a much better memory for apps and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with just a little better battery performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 13% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.