Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note3 is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, with a 77.7 score against 72.1. Both phones we are comparing come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note3 has the newer 4.4.2 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison, we must tell that it's also much older, a bit thicker and just a bit heavier.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 4 more 2.3 gigahertz cores and 5 GB more RAM memory. OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a little higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a bit bigger screen and a bit better pixels quantity per inch in the screen.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a much bigger aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited environments, a camera in the back with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution and a much bigger sensor.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features a bit more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.