Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 is much better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, with a 79.5 score against 72.1. Even being the best phone in this review, the Samsung Galaxy Note7 is an extremely older, just a bit thicker and just a little heavier phone than OPPO Reno4 Pro. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite bigger screen.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a bit better CPU than Galaxy Note7, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a greater number of faster cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 features a bit more memory to install applications and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro has just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The OPPO Reno4 Pro takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same aperture, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a much higher resolution back facing camera and a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.