Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-05 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note8 is much better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, with a overall score of 83 against 72.1. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note8 has the newer 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives you lots of additional features and improved performance. Even being the best in this comparison review, it must be told that it is also older, somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Galaxy Note8 has a processing unit that is just as good as the CPU in OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although the Galaxy Note8 has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. OPPO Reno4 Pro features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because although it has a little worse pixel density and a much lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger display.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Note8, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, a same size aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a lot bigger sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality and a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy Note8 has just a bit more memory capacity for apps and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 256 GB. OPPO Reno4 Pro features longer battery duration than Galaxy Note8, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.