Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-05 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 is much better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, having an 88.3 score against 72.1. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S10 has a more recent 11 version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version, offering a couple nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy S10 is an older and a bit thicker phone than OPPO Reno4 Pro, but Samsung could make it a little lighter anyway.
Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than OPPO Reno4 Pro. Both have 8 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor. OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy S10, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a lot worse quantity of pixels in each inch of display, it also counts with a little larger screen.
The Galaxy S10 counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy S10 also has an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB. OPPO Reno4 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy S10, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing images and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same video resolution, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a way larger camera sensor shooting much better quality photographs and videos and a lot more MP back facing camera.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro features longer battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.