Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-08-05 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is much better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, with a general score of 93.6 against 72.1. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a newer 11 version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is an older, a bit thicker and heavier phone than the OPPO Reno4 Pro.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a bit sharper display than Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a little smaller screen, a way lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit lower screen pixel density. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features much more storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy S10 5G has a little better hardware performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro. They have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. OPPO Reno4 Pro shoots better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photos and videos and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little better battery lifetime than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.