Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite has a score of 89.7, which is a lot better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's overall score of 72.1. Even being the best in this comparison review, it must be told that it's also heavier and a little thicker. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro. Both of them have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a better display than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a little bit higher display density. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with just a bit better camera than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking pictures in poorly lited situations, and they both have a back facing camera with a 48 mega pixels, a 0.5 inches back camera sensor and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features just a little better battery performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.