Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10e is better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, having an 86.3 score against 72.1. Galaxy S10e is an older and just a little bit thicker cellphone than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, but Samsung managed to build it a little bit lighter anyway. OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has a quite worse pixels density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bit bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S10e features a little faster CPU than OPPO Reno4 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. OPPO Reno4 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking photographs or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video definition, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP and a much larger back camera sensor taking lot better quality pictures and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The OPPO Reno4 Pro features longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S10e, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.