Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is way better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, getting a score of 94.8 against 72.1. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 has 13 version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version, providing the user some nice extra features. Even being the best device in this comparison review, the Galaxy S20 is an a bit thicker and a bit heavier device than OPPO Reno4 Pro.
Samsung Galaxy S20 has just a bit better processing power than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has more RAM. OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S20, because although it has a much lower display pixel density and a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little larger screen.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy S20, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor offering a worse image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with better 30 fps video frame rate, a back facing camera with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution and a larger aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations.
Galaxy S20 features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy S20 also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 has a battery life that is very similar to the battery lifetime in OPPO Reno4 Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.