Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is way better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, getting a general score of 90.8 against 72.1. Despite being the best we compare here, Galaxy S20 FE's body is heavier and a little thicker than OPPO Reno4 Pro. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S20 FE has the newer 11 version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10, offering some additional features.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy S20 FE. Both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a display of the same size and a better pixels number per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a much greater memory to install applications and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a bit better processing power than OPPO Reno4 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a little better battery life than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. OPPO Reno4 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better captures and video in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.