Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a general score of 98, which is way better than OPPO Reno4 Pro's global score of 72.1. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10. Although it's the best device in our current comparison, we must tell that it's also somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a bit better performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has more RAM memory. The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a little lower display density, a little bit smaller display and a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has an external SD slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has longer battery life than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 25% bigger battery size.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes much better photographs and videos than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking images and video in low-light situations, and they both have a same size back-facing camera sensor, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a way higher video resolution and a back facing camera with a way higher 108 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.