Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 is much better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, having a 93.4 score against 72.1. Galaxy S22 is a just a little heavier cellphone than OPPO Reno4 Pro, but both of them are 0.3inches thick. These phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 has a newer 13 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10, so it gives lots of additional features.
Samsung Galaxy S22 features a little bit better looking display than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with more display brightness and a quite greater pixels count per display inch. OPPO Reno4 Pro and Galaxy S22 both have incredibly similar storage capacity for apps and games, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a little bit better performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro. Both have 8 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy S22 has a little bit better camera than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a way bigger back camera sensor and a better resolution camera in the back.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy S22, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.