Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, getting a general score of 95.4 against 72.1. Both devices we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version, so it counts with a couple additional features. Although the Galaxy S22 Ultra is newer than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, it's somewhat thicker and a lot heavier.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra and OPPO Reno4 Pro feature similar processors, both of them have 8 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a slightly better looking screen than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a little bit higher display pixels density, a little bigger screen, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and way more brightness.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra takes better pictures and videos than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way higher video resolution and a camera with way more mega-pixels. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's storage capacity to install applications and games is just as good as OPPO Reno4 Pro's one, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has greater battery life than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.