Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-05 | -- |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 5.68 ounces | -- |
| Silky white and Starry night | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has a global score of 82.6, which is much better than OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 score. The Galaxy S25 is a incredibly thinner and notably lighter phone than OPPO Reno4 Pro. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S25 has newer 14 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10, offering some nice extra features and a performance increase.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a very superior performance than Samsung Galaxy S25. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 cores. The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a slightly better looking display than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen and a lot brighter display.
The Galaxy S25's storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is very similar to the OPPO Reno4 Pro one, both have exactly the same internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a battery life that is very similar to the OPPO Reno4 Pro one. The Galaxy S25 captures a bit better photos and videos than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way higher video quality, a much larger sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality and a back facing camera with more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.