Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-05 | -- |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 5.68 ounces | -- |
| Silky white and Starry night | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a lot better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, with a general score of 90.7 against 72.1. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is lighter and incredibly thinner than OPPO Reno4 Pro. Both devices in this review include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a newer 14 version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a sharper display than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little bigger display, a little bit more pixels per inch in the display and way more brightness. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a superior storage for games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity.
OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a very superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features improved battery lifetime than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size. The Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots way better photos and videos than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels, a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.