Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S5 Sport has a general score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's overall score of 72.1. Galaxy S5 Sport's design is just a little bit lighter than OPPO Reno4 Pro, although it's somewhat thicker and was released many years before. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy S5 Sport has a newer 4.4.2 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10.
The Galaxy S5 Sport features a CPU that's just as good as the OPPO Reno4 Pro one, because although the Galaxy S5 Sport has a lower amount of RAM and 4 less cores (but faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a slightly better looking display than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels quantity in each display inch.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a back camera with much more mega pixels, a much larger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photographs and a much bigger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in low light environments.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. OPPO Reno4 Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.