Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-08-05 | -- |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | -- |
| Silky white and Starry night | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 Active has a general score of 80.9, which is better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's global score of 72.1. The Galaxy S6 Active is a way lighter but thicker phone than the OPPO Reno4 Pro. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but Galaxy S6 Active has 5.0 version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version.
Galaxy S6 Active counts with just a little better processing power than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bit processor and an additional GPU. Galaxy S6 Active counts with a bit better display than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better display pixel density.
OPPO Reno4 Pro captures a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, a lot larger sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality and a larger aperture for better low-light photos and video.
OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a superior memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. OPPO Reno4 Pro features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 14% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.