Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 is much better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, with a global score of 79.5 against 72.1. The Samsung Galaxy S7 body is just a little lighter than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, but it is a little thicker and was released many years before. Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a little sharper screen than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has much darker display and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel count in each screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features a better memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S7, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. OPPO Reno4 Pro features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S7, because it has a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro has greater battery duration than Galaxy S7, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. OPPO Reno4 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same video quality, the same video frame rate and the same diafragm aperture, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much better resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.