Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is slightly better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, getting a score of 75.8 against 72.1. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active is a better phone than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, it must be noted that it is also an a lot older, noticeably thicker and somewhat heavier phone. The Galaxy S7 Active features a slightly better looking screen than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen and much worse brightness, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater pixels density.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores. The OPPO Reno4 Pro shoots a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, a F1.7 diafragm aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a way better 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a battery performance that is just as good as OPPO Reno4 Pro's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.