Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-08-05 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 edge is slightly better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, with a 78.1 score against 72.1. Galaxy S7 edge is a just a little lighter device than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, but they have the same thickness. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S7 edge has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10, offering a couple nice extra features.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a little lower screen density, it also counts with a bigger display. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has more RAM and a higher number of cores.
OPPO Reno4 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a back facing camera with a much better resolution and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing better quality videos and pictures.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a little better battery performance than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.