Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 has an overall score of 81.7, which is better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's general score of 72.1. Samsung Galaxy S8's design is just a bit lighter than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, but it's just a little bit thicker and was released 3 years before. OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a lot worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a lot lower pixels quantity per screen inch, it also counts with a quite larger display.
OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S8, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM. The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a superior camera than Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, a F1.7 aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a much larger sensor and a much better resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy S8 counts with just a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 256 GB. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy S8, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.