Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 Active is much better than OPPO Reno4 Pro, getting a score of 81.9 against 72.1. Even being the best cellphone we are comparing, Galaxy S8 Active's construction is much older, extremely heavier and notably thicker than OPPO Reno4 Pro. The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a little bit better looking display than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a way lower number of pixels in each inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has more RAM. Galaxy S8 Active has slightly more memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
Galaxy S8 Active's battery duration is just as good as the battery life in OPPO Reno4 Pro. OPPO Reno4 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a lot larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.