Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-05 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 has a general score of 83.3, which is much better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 score. Despite being the best in this review, Galaxy S9 is a way older, just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier phone than OPPO Reno4 Pro. Galaxy S9 features just a little better performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a little bit better display than Galaxy S9, because although it has a way lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a lot less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit larger display. The Galaxy S9 has a quite bigger storage for apps and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 400 GB.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro features greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The OPPO Reno4 Pro captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a lot larger sensor and a lot better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.