Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is much better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, with a global score of 80.1 against 72.1. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10. Even being the best device in this comparison review, Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is noticeably heavier and notably thicker than OPPO Reno4 Pro.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much lower screen pixel density and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a larger display. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with more memory capacity for apps and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit superior CPU than OPPO Reno4 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a back camera with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution, a way better video quality and a much bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little better battery lifetime than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 13% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.