Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 405 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is much better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, having an 81 score against 72.1. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version. The Galaxy XCover Pro is a noticeably heavier and notably thicker cellphone than the OPPO Reno4 Pro.
OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite worse quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a greater memory for games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
OPPO Reno4 Pro has a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has more RAM memory. OPPO Reno4 Pro has a superior camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also has a much better resolution back camera, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little longer battery life than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.