Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is much better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's overall score of 72.1. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's construction is just a little thinner but heavier than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and they were released only a couple of months apart. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10, so it provides a lot of extra features.
Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little bit less pixels per screen inch, a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit smaller display.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
OPPO Reno4 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a much bigger sensor providing a much better image quality, a larger diafragm aperture and a much more megapixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.