Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has an overall score of 85.6, which is much better than OPPO Reno4 Pro's 72.1 global score. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's design is newer and just a little thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the OPPO Reno4 Pro. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a newer 11 version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version, providing lots of additional features.
OPPO Reno4 Pro features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, a little lower pixel amount per inch in the screen and a quite smaller display. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's memory capacity for games and applications is very similar to OPPO Reno4 Pro's one, both of them have the same internal storage.
Galaxy Z Flip 3 features a little better hardware performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro. Both have 8 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a greater camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited environments.
OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.