Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is way better than OPPO Reno4 Pro's global score of 72.1. Although the Galaxy Z Flip 5G and OPPO Reno4 Pro were released with only 0 months difference, Galaxy Z Flip 5G's design is heavier but just a bit thinner. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a newer 11 version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version, providing the user some nice extra features and performance tweaks.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit more powerful CPU than OPPO Reno4 Pro. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM and 8 processing cores. The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a just a bit inferior pixel number per inch in the display and a little lower 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much better memory to store more apps and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity. OPPO Reno4 Pro has longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. OPPO Reno4 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.