Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro, with a general score of 94.6 against 72.1. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has newer 11 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version, giving you some nice extra features. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 2 and the OPPO Reno4 Pro were released with only 1 months difference, Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is noticeably heavier but just a bit thinner than the OPPO Reno4 Pro.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro has a better display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a just a bit better screen pixel density. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a little better performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has worse video frame rate and a tinier back-facing camera sensor which offers a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Reno4 Pro also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures in low-light environments and a way more mega-pixels camera.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with just a bit better battery performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 13 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.