Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-08-05 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a score of 90.6, which is way better than OPPO Reno4 Pro's global score of 72.1. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS, but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a more recent 11 version while OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version. Galaxy Z Fold 3's body is newer and somewhat thinner than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's, although it's extremely heavier.
The OPPO Reno4 Pro counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater display density. The Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit faster CPU than OPPO Reno4 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. OPPO Reno4 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a lot larger camera aperture to take better low-light images and videos and a camera in the back with a much higher resolution.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit longer battery life than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.