Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-08-05 | -- |
| 6.31 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Silky white and Starry night | Black Shadow |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a general score of 91.1, which is much better than the OPPO Reno4 Pro's global score of 72.1. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has newer 14 version and OPPO Reno4 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives you some extra features and performance improvements. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a much heavier but extremely thinner phone than OPPO Reno4 Pro.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has just a bit better looking screen than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because although it has a little lower number of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger screen, a much brighter screen and a better 1968 x 2184 resolution. OPPO Reno4 Pro has a very superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a very superior memory for apps and games than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a bit superior battery performance than OPPO Reno4 Pro, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
OPPO Reno4 Pro takes a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because although it has a back facing camera with much less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.